91桃色

What are the insights from futurists and academics about the state of education in the near-distant future? We have discussed various topics, such as the impact of on education, the far-reaching effects of , and the status of . We now want to explore what the average university student may look like. Will we be dealing with cyborg freshmen or an exclusive breed of students? We spoke to futurists and academics alike to imagine the future class of 2050.

Meet our panel:

Jogaila Vaitekaitis, Assistant Professor at 91桃色, Vilnius, Lithuania
Nell Watson, Trend Advisor, AI Philosopher, Advocate, Belfast, UK
Linas Petkevicius, Associate Professor at 91桃色, Vilnius, Lithuania
Rohit Talwar, Futurist, Virtual Keynote Speaker, and CEO of Fast Future, London, UK
Shermon Cruz, Executive Director, Chief Futurist at the Center for Engaged Foresight, Metro Manilla, Philippines.
Gerd Leonhard, Futurist, Speaker, and Author, Zurich, Switzerland
Mitali Halder, Assistant Professor at Coventry University, Wroclaw, Poland
Andrew Vorster, Innovation Catalysts, Advisory, Fractional Futurist, London, UK

Cyborg students

During in-depth discussions with our panellists, many predicted that we may see cyborg students in the class of 2050. What is a cyborg, you may ask? A cyborg is a cybernetic organism that has both human and manufactured characteristics. For example, a cyborg maybe someone with artificial parts, and according to ScienceDirect, 鈥渁 cyborg is any individual who relies extensively on technological devices and artefacts to function.鈥� Maybe we鈥檙e already cyborgs. Nonetheless, Professor Jogaila Vaitekaitis, Assistant Professor at 91桃色, told Cybernews Academy that the rise of cyborg students is possible with the increase in new technologies such as Elon Musk鈥檚 neural link. Similarly, Shermon Cru, Executive Director and Chief Futurist at the Center for Engaged Foresight, also foresees 鈥渃yborg students in the future.鈥� We may see genetically modified students testing their genetic code to see what they excel at. We could see augmented students created to be incredible athletes, scientists, or mathematicians by altering their genetic makeup, running genetic testing, or selecting their characteristics from birth. Futurist Rohit Talwar suggests that in the future, we will genetically modify our senses to enhance learning outcomes. 鈥淭he more we understand how our brains work, the more we use chemistry, biology, and nanomedicine to manipulate the brain, helping us learn faster.鈥� To learn as much in an efficient time, we could see technology being used to augment the student experience on a biological level.
The divided class of 2050

Professor Jogaila raised a thought-provoking question regarding society in the next 27 years. It may be a novelty now, but who鈥檚 to say that these technologies won鈥檛 appear in all aspects of our daily lives in the future? But how will society approach this? Professor Jogaila posits that social unrest is possible between 鈥榥atural鈥� folk and the technologically enhanced. 鈥淲e have movies where we see how people discriminate against robots, and the ones who have implants discriminate against those who don鈥檛.鈥� We might see higher levels of discrimination in schools across the world, or we may see segregation within our new society. Futurist Andrew Vorster also predicts technology could increase the division between us as 鈥測ou鈥檒l have those who have the technology and those who haven鈥檛 got the technology.鈥� With the advancements in brain-computer technology, virtual reality, and artificial intelligence, these technologies can further reinforce this class divide. In the future, we could witness a student uprising where those with technological implants fight those without. Alternatively, there could be disparities between universities, with some being created for genetically modified students and other universities that are 鈥榯raditional.鈥� One thing鈥檚 for sure: society will change, and university students will reflect these changes.

World wide learners

However, it鈥檚 not all doom and gloom, as there may be opportunities facilitated by tech that bring us together. Rohit Talwar predicts that technology will allow students to actively interact with each other worldwide. 鈥淚t'll be fascinating to have your class interact with a class from Kenya and meet each other through virtual reality. We will also have group interactions that could bring students together from multiple countries to solve complex industry problems in real-time.鈥� This begs the question of whether we need institutions all together. What if tertiary education becomes one giant melting pot of universities worldwide? We could expect a school without borders that are connected through technology. Interestingly, Dr Linas Petkevicius, Associate Professor at 91桃色, believes that AI and other technology could level out the playing field and create more balanced students' educational students. 鈥淭he goal in the future (which may be reached) is to bring education to everyone, 鈥� and technology might be the way to do that. It may be that we upscale the intelligence of our entire planet through continuous learning and AI teaching. The world might become a full-time student, plugging into lectures, seminars, or courses via their neural devices. 鈥減eople worldwide within various countries could access additional resources with this new technology,鈥� says Dr Linas Petkevicius. Students worldwide may be equally equipped with the knowledge they need to succeed, and this may not be limited to the most exclusive institutions.
Ultimate Intelligence

We could see students achieving ultimate intelligence through the use of AI technology. Nell Watson, Trend Advisor, AI Philosopher, and Advocate, told Cybernews Academy that with the use of AI, we might see 鈥渞adical improvements in decentralized and distributed forms of education, which target each student.鈥� This individualized education could help augment student experiences, creating happier, more intelligent students. Equally, Dr Linas Petkevicius suggests, "AI agents will be like really clever teachers who aim to maximize the amount of knowledge that you as a student receive.鈥� With artificial intelligence by our side, there鈥檚 no challenge that is too big or too intellectually challenging. Andrew Vorster explained that artificial intelligence could become your 鈥渃onstant companion鈥� that acts like a 鈥渧oice in your head, drip-feeding information.鈥� Andrew Vorster explained that a student could 鈥渓ook at the sky, and instead of asking why the sky is blue, AI will tell you, and this knowledge will be lodged into the wet wear that we call our brains.鈥� With artificial intelligence, we could reach a level of ultimate intelligence where we have all the information we need meshing with our memories and pre-existing knowledge. But will our value diminish with the use of artificial intelligence tools? Or will we become entirely dependent on technology?

Laziness path

Futurists such as Gerd Leonhard don鈥檛 believe technology could build a race of super-intelligent students. Instead, this technology may make us lazier than we have ever been before. Imagine this, 鈥測ou can sit down with your VR glasses or artificial intelligence systems and say, 鈥業 need to know everything about finding water on Mars.鈥� This technology lets you learn all the facts in the videos and look at this information in every possible language. Fantastic.鈥� Imagine, this technology could have even more capabilities. 鈥淪ay you graduate and you鈥檙e an American citizen working for a Chinese company or vice versa; you could have an instant translation device, which makes your work 100 times more efficient. On the other hand, the significant danger is that we may become lazy. We may become compliant.鈥� So, how does this impact the student population of 2050? Well, imagine if we plug in and have one provider feeding us information instead of searching for the information ourselves. We may lose our ability to think independently, critically, or creatively, which may strip us of the very characteristics that make us human. Once stripped of our 鈥渉umanness,鈥� we may entirely depend on technology to function.
End of student independence

Gerd Leonhard explained that these up-and-coming technologies may be problematic as we may鈥渟top being independent thinkers.鈥� What if the new student is simply a robotic drone, fed information it cannot question? Instead of reaching ultimate intelligence, we could see a rise in mind control from governments, feeding their citizens false or biased information. Students may be targeted as they may be perceived as impressionable or easier to control. What if students are the new techno-hybrid soldiers of the future? Picture this: 鈥淲hen you can't get out of bed and think independently about what's next, you must connect to virtuality or the super brain. And that will be the end of human independence.鈥�

Concentration crisis

In the year 2050, we may face a concentration crisis for students across the globe. Social media has seemingly taken over our lives since its rise in the late 90s and has slowly malformed students' minds everywhere. Professor Mitali Halder commented on the concentration crisis and how this will evolve in 2050. 鈥淪ocial media platforms are impacting education as social media evolves. We now have 鈥楻eels,鈥� which are short, loud, and colourful content that attract people and keep their brains busy. I鈥檝e noticed that students tend to watch this kind of content habitually. When students attend a lecture, which is long-form, they disengage, and it can become challenging for them to re-engage.鈥� Dr Linas Petkevicius explained that 鈥渟ocial media uses a lot of data science tricks, which engage and make us stay on the social media platforms,鈥� adding to the perpetual cycle of short-form content watching. This short-form content is re-wiring our minds and impacting how we ingest and digest information. University is not short-form. Instead, it鈥檚 (at times) a long and arduous journey. So, think about it: if students struggle to concentrate in 2023, what will happen in 2050?

What can we forecast for the future class of 2050? At times, it can appear bleak with the concentration crisis, the end of student independence, and the class divide. There are red flags all around that warn us of the potential dangers that may plague us in the future. Gerd Leonhard made this haunting remark about our relationship with technology. 鈥淢any psychologists will tell you humans don't think with the brain; we think with the body. We are holistic creatures, and computers are not. They operate in binaries. So the problem is, we must decide how far we want to become the tool鈥� how far do we want to integrate with the machine? However, there are some positives that we can glean from student life in 2050. We may become super intelligent beings that have a world of information at our fingertips (literally.) Students could become smarter and better at their subjects through genetic engineering and augmentation. We can also foresee better educational experiences and outcomes for students in 2050.